Antivirus Performance Comparison

It’s important to know how many computer resources your antivirus program will consume. The best antivirus programs will have a minimal impact on performance of your system but still offer excellent protection against viruses and malware.

Most antivirus software companies publish extensive tests in PDF format. The reports include at-a-glance ratings of performance, protection and usability for each of the suites, along with precise graphs and charts showing the results of specific testing elements. Important figures to watch out for include the percentage of real-world or reference set malware threats that are blocked, neutralised or compromised by the program, as well as the number of false positive detections of benign swarthmore connect to printer software.

Avast Free Antivirus had the most impressive scores for Windows virus detection in tests conducted by AVComparatives in June 2023. It also had the highest rates of success in blocking Mac malware. It also scored high in the passive, full-scan and quick-scan categories.

Among paid programs, Bitdefender Total Security had the tiniest post-installation background system impact which was followed by Kaspersky Total Security and ESET Security Cloud Free. It was the slowest in both full-scans and quick-scans. The program’s relatively low impact on background could be because it doesn’t run as a default on Windows 10 or 11, like the majority of its rivals.

Intego X10 had the lowest overall system impact on the background and full scan yet it was able to find every single piece of malware tested. It’s not often that a company concentrates solely on Macs and is an essential part of any security arsenal.